As for the phase of the spectrum, what do we expect? We have chosen
the sinusoid phase to be zero. The window is causal and symmetric
about its middle. Therefore, we expect a linear phase term with slope
samples (as discussed in connection with the shift theorem
in §7.4.4). Also, the window transform has sidelobes which
cause a phase of
radians to switch in and out. Thus, we expect
to see samples of a straight line with slope
across the main
lobe of the window transform, together with a switching offset by
in every other sidelobe away from the main lobe, starting with
the immediately adjacent sidelobes.
In Fig. 8.9, we can see the negatively sloped line across the
main lobe of the window transform, but the sidelobes are hard to
follow. Even the unwrapped phase in Fig. 8.9b is not as clear
as it could be. One could add logic to unwrap to interpret
phase-jumps by
(to within some numerical tolerance) as
alternating in sign, since a phase jump of
is equivalent to a
phase jump of
. Doing this would give a straight line at the
desired slope interrupted by temporary jumps of
radians. In
Fig. 8.9b, starting near frequency
, all phase jumps are by
. If instead the 2nd, 4th, 6th, and so on were jumps by
,
a more intuitive phase plot would result.
To convert the expected phase slope from
``radians per
(rad/sec)'' to ``radians per cycle-per-sample,'' we need to multiply
by ``radians per cycle,'' or
. Thus, in Fig. 8.9, we
expect a slope of
radians per unit normalized frequency, or
radians per
cycles-per-sample, and this looks about
right, judging from the plot.
![]() |